Organizational Perception on Technology Adoption of Recruitment Process in Nigeria Civil Service: The Moderating Role of User Attitude

Aminu Tangaza Ibrahim, Mohd Fitri Bin Mansor, Rusli Bin Haji Abd.Hamid


Information technology is increasingly gaining position within working organizations and many of its adherents assume and express its importance. A quite number of studies were conducted to assess perception on technology adoption; most of these studies concentrated on the perception of jobseekers, third party (Highring Company) and came up with inconclusive results. This paper is working toward the assessment of an organizational perception not the jobseeker’s perspective on technology adoption, by proposing framework that predicts the role of user attitude as potential moderator on the relationship between organizational perceptions toward the usefulness of information technology system in the selecting of qualified personnel. The proposed model will have important policy implication to an organization for their recruitment decision making.

Full Text:



Subramony, M., A meta‐analytic investigation of the relationship between HRM bundles and firm performance. Human resource management, 2009. 48(5): p. 745-768.

Breaugh, J.A. and M. Starke, Research on employee recruitment: So many studies, so many remaining questions. Journal of management, 2000. 26(3): p. 405-434.

Dhamija, P., E-recruitment: a roadmap towards e-human resource management. Researchers World, 2012. 3(3): p. 33.

Mondy, R.W. and R.M. Noe, Human Resource Management, , ed. 10th2008, New Jersey: Prentice Hall

Peretomode, V. and O. Peretomode, Human Resources Management: Principles. Policies and Practice, Lagos: Onosomegbowho Ogbinaka Publishers, 2001.

Thomas, S.L. and K. Ray, Recruiting and the web: high-tech hiring. Business Horizons, 2000. 43(3): p. 43-52.

Yoon Kin Tong, D., A study of e-recruitment technology adoption in Malaysia. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2009. 109(2): p. 281-300.

Sylva, H. and S.T. Mol, E‐Recruitment: A study into applicant perceptions of an online application system. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2009. 17(3): p. 311-323.

Brahmana, R.K. and R. Brahmana, What Factors Drive Job Seekers Attitude in Using E-Recruitment? The South East Asian Journal of Management, 2013. 7(2): p. 39.

CIPD, Recruitment and Retention2007, London: Chartered Institute of Personnel Development (CIPD).

Lau, G. and V. Hooper, Adoption of e-HRM in large New Zealand organizations. Encyclopedia of Human Resources Information Systems: Challenges in e-HRM: Challenges in e-HRM, 2008.

Sadiq, U., K.I. Ahmad Fareed Khan, and B.G. Mujtaba, The Impact of Information Systems on the Performance of Human Resources Department.  Strategic Human Resource Management at Tertiary Level, 2013: p. 31.

Beadles, I., et al., The impact of human resource information systems: An exploratory study in the public sector. Communications of the IIMA, 2015. 5(4): p. 6.

Wyatt, W., eHR: Getting Results along the Journey-2002 survey report. Retrieved August, 2002. 16: p. 2010.

Sanusi, A. and A.M. Mohamed, Relationship between E-recruitment Adoption and Good Governance Practices in Nigerian Public Sector: An Empirical Study. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 2012. 2(4): p. 57-70.

SH, T.T., Demographic and motivation variables associated with Internet usage activities. Internet Research, 2001. 11(2): p. 125-137.

Yoon Kin Tong, D. and C. Sivanand, E-recruitment service providers review: International and Malaysian. Employee relations, 2005. 27(1): p. 103-117.

Al-Gahtani, S., The applicability of TAM outside North America: an empirical test in the United Kingdom. Information Resources Management Journal, 2001. 14(3): p. 37.

Davis, F.D., User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International journal of man-machine studies, 1993. 38(3): p. 475-487.

Mathwick, C., Understanding the online consumer: A typology of online relational norms and behavior. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2002. 16(1): p. 40-55.

Tan, M. and T.S. Teo, Factors influencing the adoption of Internet banking. Journal of the AIS, 2000. 1(1es): p. 5.

Bhattacherjee, A., Individual trust in online firms: Scale development and initial test. Journal of management information systems, 2002. 19(1): p. 211-241.

Agarwal, R. and J. Prasad, Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies? Decision sciences, 1999. 30(2): p. 361-391.

Yaghoubi, N.-M., Factors Affecting the Adoption of Online Banking-An Integration of Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Planned Behavior. International journal of business and management, 2010. 5(9): p. p159.

Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen, Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research1975.

Singh, H., The importance of customer satisfaction in relation to customer loyalty and retention. Academy of Marketing Science, 2006. 60: p. 193-225.

Parasuraman, A. and D. Grewal, The impact of technology on the quality-value-loyalty chain: a research agenda. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 2000. 28(1): p. 168-174.

Davis, F.D., Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 1989: p. 319-340.

Lee, W., T. Tyrrell, and M. Erdem, Exploring the behavioral aspects of adopting technology: Meeting planners' use of social network media and the impact of perceived critical mass. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 2013. 4(1): p. 6-22.

Said, A.-G. and K. Malcolm, Attitudes, satisfaction and usage: factors contributing to each in the acceptance of information technology. Behaviour & Information Technology, 1999. 18(4): p. 277-297.

Althunibat, A. and N. Sahari, Modelling the factors that influence mobile government services acceptance. African Journal of Business Management, 2011. 5(34): p. 13030.

Voermans, M. and M. van Veldhoven, Attitude towards E-HRM: an empirical study at Philips. Personnel Review, 2007. 36(6): p. 887-902.


Baron, R.M. and D.A. Kenny, The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986. 51(6): p. 1173.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

MAYFEB Journal of Business and Management
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
ISSN 2371-7742